The United States has fallen
to 19th place in a global ranking of well-being, down three spots from last
year. That’s according to the 2016 edition of the Social Progress Index, one of
the most comprehensive international measures of well-being.
America was eclipsed by
Belgium, Spain and France in the past year according to the measure, which
evaluates countries on their ability to provide basic human needs (measures of
water and shelter), the foundations of well-being (measures of health and
education) and opportunity (measures of equality and personal rights).
The U.S. is the world’s
largest economy as measured by gross domestic product, but the Social Progress
Index was designed by those who see shortcomings in the traditional measure of
GDP, because they do not take into account things like the health of the
population, or crime, or the environment or even whether citizens have basic
human rights. The index, for example, could be a better measure whether nations
are making progress against the “Global Goals” of the United Nations.
Across a number of such
“non-economic” measures, the U.S. fares particularly poorly for a rich nation,
according to the index, because of its high obesity rate, high homicide rate,
high level of traffic fatalities and unequal access to higher education.
U.S. citizens “are getting a
pretty raw deal when it comes to translating the country’s wealth into social
progress,” said Michael Green, executive director of the Social Progress
Imperative, which produces the index.
Finland topped the index
this year, followed closely by Canada, Denmark, Australia and Switzerland. The
diversity of the countries atop the list underscores that there is not just one
path to prosperity, said David Cruickshank, the global chairman of Deloitte, which
is a partner in producing the index.
“Canada has a very different
social structure, a much different race composition, quite different from the
Scandinavian countries,” he said. While Scandinavian countries have much higher
taxes than the U.S., Switzerland and Australia have fairly low taxes, he noted.
Criticizing GDP has a long
and storied history. Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy famously
lambasted GDP during his 1968 presidential campaign, saying GDP “measures
everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile.” The Economist
and The Atlantic have splashed stories about the inadequacies of GDP on their
covers. In recent years, GDP has climbed to new highs under President Barack
Obama, and many conservatives too have turned to highlighting things not
measured by GDP, such as falling median incomes, rising numbers of people on
food stamps, or soaring levels of student debt.
The Social Progress
Imperative has more information on the methodology and a detailed breakdown by
country on its website.
Credit: Wall Street Journal
No comments:
Post a Comment